The Government responds to the advisors by spoiling Easter with a new bureaucratic bungling

The Government responds to the advisors by spoiling Easter with a new bureaucratic bungling

Barely three weeks after the group of more than 70,000 social graduates, lawyers, economists, accountants and administrative managers that help companies develop all their tax and labor procedures was shaken by a historic mobilization in the face of the “bureaucratic nightmare” in which they live immersed by the bombardment of regulatory changes, rectifications and computer errors and continuous notificationsthe Government has not only ignored their demands, but has returned to its old ways with a new ‘botched’ that has made Holy Week bitter for many.

On this occasion, the most affected have been the more than 25,000 social graduateswho ‘had breakfast’ on Holy Thursday with the publication in the Official State Gazette with the publication of a new order that develops the legal norms for contributions to Social Security, unemployment, protection for cessation of activity, Salary Guarantee Fund and training professional for the year 2024, a text that replaces the previous one published on January 29. The reason for this update is none other than the increase in the SMI that was published on February 7 in the BOE but has retroactive effects from January 1.

The 5% increase not only affects what workers earn. It also requires a review of the contribution bases and has led to other changes such as the 5% increase in the surcharge introduced by Social Security for contracts of less than 30 days. YesIt is precisely these issues that must also be reviewed retroactively those regulated by the order published last week, more than two months after the update of the minimum wage.

Among social graduates, the delay in processing has been strange. The January one was published ‘only’ 29 days after the extension of the 2023 Budget came into force, which also included revisions to the quotes, while the new one took 53 days. But the surprise has translated into discomfort when seeing the date chosen to publish them and seeing that the text includes several corrections to errors in the previous order, which has forced them to review their clients’ files even more thoroughly.

A far from anecdotal error

The last straw occurs when this Wednesday, April 3, it is published the first error correction of the standard published six days ago. And it is not just any error: it occurs in the tables that regulate the maximum and minimum contribution bases for contingencies common to the General Regime for each group of professional categories.

In the first draft, a single table was included that estimated these limits in euros per month for the 11 groups. But when analyzing the amounts, it is seen that, while the first seven groups moved between a range of 1,847.4 to 1,823 for the minimum bases to 4,720.50 for the maximum, the remaining four fell from 44.10 euros for the minimum base. to 157.35 for the maximum base.

How is this jump possible? Easy: the bases for the second block of professional groups They are calculated as euros per day, which must appear in a separate table to avoid this confusion. This is what the correction does, which seems to resolve a simple anecdotal typo. But it is not so much for business advisors. Although the error was evident and the professionals saw it from the first moment, what counts is what the BOE includes. and the correction It has taken six calendar days and three business days to be publishedin which editions of the Bulletin have been published, have blocked many procedures.

Advisors study their new steps

The real drama of these advisors, who provide services to thousands of SMEs and the self-employed, has the consideration of “collaborators” of an electronic administration that, according to what they denounce, does not understand concepts such as vacations, holidays, weekends or the most basic principles of the right to digital disconnection.

This new incident occurs at a time when the group is studying how to defend their demands after the protest on March 14, with which they even threatened to ‘collapse’ the telematic procedures from the Tax Agency, the SEPE or the Social Security itself. Finally, there were no problems in the service or notable incidents, although the organizers consider that the objective of achieving visibility of their situation was more than met.

But what happened these days once again shows that the Government has not taken the hint. In this sense, it is significant that the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security and Migration, today directed by Elma Saizit was up to a few months José Luis Escrivácurrent Minister of Digital Transition and Public Service and directly responsible of the problems of electronic administration.


Source link